claude-news
paperarXiv (systems, data, ML)·23 Oct 2026·Xin He

Phase Transition from Random Features to Fully Trainable Networks

Phase transition between random features and fully trained networks.

Depth 2/5Score 3.06

Abstract

Constructing accurate and computationally tractable approximation spaces is a fundamental task in scientific computing. Partially trainable neural networks bridge fixed random features and fully adaptive representations. This paper quantifies a phase transition pattern in approximation bounds and observes analogous behavior in training errors: a rapid but smooth initial improvement followed by diminishing returns, with a sharper transition under greater initialization mismatch. Under polynomial spectral decay with exponent $α>1$ and leverage compatibility, we establish a squared $L_2$ approximation rate $\mathcal{O}((κ_P\log(m/δ)/m)^α)$ for two-layer networks of width $m$ and trainable proportion $P$, where $κ_P=(P/κ_1^+(1-P)/κ_0^)^{-1}$. The bound holds uniformly over the unit ball of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) with probability at least $1-δ$. The constants $κ_0^$ and $κ_1^$ quantify the fixed and trainable groups' sampling mismatches relative to the target RKHS. For spherical biased-ReLU features in dimension $d$, we verify these assumptions with $α=(d+2)/(d-1)$ and $κ_0^=4\sqrt{2}τ(d+1)/d$ for initialization scale $τ\ge1$, and $κ_1^=1$ under ridge leverage sampling. For $d=5$ and $τ=10$, a trainable proportion of approximately $4.1%$ captures $90%$ of the reduction in the approximation bound from $P=0$ to $P=1$. A structured three-layer example illustrates how a few trainable first-layer neurons exploit fixed downstream blocks through nonlinear composition. Numerical experiments across diverse settings, including networks with up to 15 layers, exhibit similar phase transitions in training errors.